mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SED: Self-Evaluation Decoding Enhances Large Language Models for Better Generation

arXiv 2405.16552 ↗First posted 26 May 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) generate text through unidirectional autoregressive decoding methods to respond to various user queries. These methods tend to consider token selection in a simple sequential manner, making it easy to fall into suboptimal options when encountering uncertain tokens, referred to as chaotic points in our work. Many chaotic points exist in texts generated by LLMs, and they often significantly affect the quality of subsequently generated tokens, which can interfere with LLMs' generation. This paper proposes Self-Evaluation Decoding, SED, a decoding method for enhancing model generation. Analogous to the human decision-making process, SED integrates speculation and evaluation steps into the decoding process, allowing LLMs to make more careful decisions and thus optimize token selection at chaotic points. Experimental results across various tasks using different LLMs demonstrate SED's effectiveness.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2024.

Builds on

32 of 42 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  8. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  10. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
  11. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  12. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
20 more
  1. 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
  2. 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
  3. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
  4. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 367
  5. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 357
  6. 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
  7. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
  8. 2024Unlocking Efficiency in Large Language Model Inference: A Comprehensive Survey of Speculative Decodingcited by 266
  9. 2019MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehensioncited by 183
  10. 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 163
  11. 2023Learning From Mistakes Makes LLM Better Reasonercited by 97
  12. 2023Shepherd: A Critic for Language Model Generationcited by 96
  13. 2019Comparison of Diverse Decoding Methods from Conditional Language Modelscited by 78
  14. 2024DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Modelscited by 55
  15. 2023Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluationcited by 52
  16. 2024ChatGLM-Math: Improving Math Problem-Solving in Large Language Models with a Self-Critique Pipelinecited by 47
  17. 2024In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 43
  18. 2024Small Language Model Can Self-correctcited by 23
  19. 2023Critique Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 20
  20. 2024FLAP: Flow-Adhering Planning with Constrained Decoding in LLMscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

5 papers.