Uncertainty Measurement of Deep Learning System based on the Convex Hull of Training Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning (DL) has made remarkable achievements in computer vision and adopted in safety critical domains such as medical imaging or autonomous drive. Thus, it is necessary to understand the uncertainty of the model to effectively reduce accidents and losses due to misjudgment of the Deep Neural Networks (DNN). This can start by efficiently selecting data that could potentially malfunction to the model. Traditionally, data collection and labeling have been done manually, but recently test data selection methods have emerged that focus on capturing samples that are not relevant to what the model had been learned. They're selected based on the activation pattern of neurons in DNN, entropy minimization based on softmax output of the DL. However, these methods cannot quantitatively analyze the extent to which unseen samples are extrapolated from the training data. Therefore, we propose To-hull Uncertainty and Closure Ratio, which measures an uncertainty of trained model based on the convex hull of training data. It can observe the positional relation between the convex hull of the learned data and an unseen sample and infer how extrapolate the sample is from the convex hull. To evaluate the proposed method, we conduct empirical studies on popular datasets and DNN models, compared to state-of-the art test selection metrics. As a result of the experiment, the proposed To-hull Uncertainty is effective in finding samples with unusual patterns (e.g. adversarial attack) compared to the existing test selection metric.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2024.
Builds on
23 of 45 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2021High-Performance Large-Scale Image Recognition Without Normalizationcited by 359
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
- 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 144
11 more
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
- 2019A General Framework for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learningcited by 119
- 2020Invertible Concept-based Explanations for CNN Models with Non-negative Concept Activation Vectorscited by 119
- 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
- 2021Recent advances and clinical applications of deep learning in medical image analysiscited by 104
- 2018Grounding Visual Explanationscited by 92
- 2021PRIMA: General and Precise Neural Network Certification via Scalable Convex Hull Approximationscited by 77
- 2020Confidence Estimation via Auxiliary Modelscited by 33
- 2019Boosting Operational DNN Testing Efficiency through Conditioningcited by 22
- 2019Input Prioritization for Testing Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2015Sparse Approximation via Generating Point Setscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.