mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature Protection For Out-of-distribution Generalization

arXiv 2405.16027 ↗First posted 25 May 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the availability of large pre-trained models, a modern workflow for building real-world machine learning solutions is to fine-tune such models on a downstream task with a relatively small domain-specific dataset. In such applications, one major challenge is that the small fine-tuning dataset does not have sufficient coverage of the distribution encountered when the model is deployed. It is thus important to design fine-tuning methods that are robust to out-of-distribution (OOD) data that are under-represented by the training data. This paper compares common fine-tuning methods to investigate their OOD performance and demonstrates that standard methods will result in a significant change to the pre-trained model so that the fine-tuned features overfit the fine-tuning dataset. However, this causes deteriorated OOD performance. To overcome this issue, we show that protecting pre-trained features leads to a fine-tuned model more robust to OOD generalization. We validate the feature protection methods with extensive experiments of fine-tuning CLIP on ImageNet and DomainNet.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 23 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  4. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  5. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  6. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  7. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  8. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
  9. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  10. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  11. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  12. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 227
9 more
  1. 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
  2. 2023Task-Specific Skill Localization in Fine-tuned Language Modelscited by 105
  3. 2023Multimodality Helps Unimodality: Cross-Modal Few-Shot Learning with Multimodal Modelscited by 91
  4. 2021Continual Learning for Text Classification with Information Disentanglement Based Regularizationcited by 86
  5. 2022Probing Representation Forgetting in Supervised and Unsupervised Continual Learningcited by 76
  6. 2021The Evolution of Out-of-Distribution Robustness Throughout Fine-Tuningcited by 75
  7. 2022Domain-Adjusted Regression or: ERM May Already Learn Features Sufficient for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 69
  8. 2023Simple and Fast Group Robustness by Automatic Feature Reweightingcited by 68
  9. 2023Trainable Projected Gradient Method for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 37

Built on by

Not cited yet.