mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inference of Utilities and Time Preference in Sequential Decision-Making

arXiv 2405.15975 ↗First posted 24 May 2024math.OC cs.LG q-fin.CPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a novel stochastic control framework to enhance the capabilities of automated investment managers, or robo-advisors, by accurately inferring clients' investment preferences from past activities. Our approach leverages a continuous-time model that incorporates utility functions and a generic discounting scheme of a time-varying rate, tailored to each client's risk tolerance, valuation of daily consumption, and significant life goals. We address the resulting time inconsistency issue through state augmentation and the establishment of the dynamic programming principle and the verification theorem. Additionally, we provide sufficient conditions for the identifiability of client investment preferences. To complement our theoretical developments, we propose a learning algorithm based on maximum likelihood estimation within a discrete-time Markov Decision Process framework, augmented with entropy regularization. We prove that the log-likelihood function is locally concave, facilitating the fast convergence of our proposed algorithm. Practical effectiveness and efficiency are showcased through two numerical examples, including Merton's problem and an investment problem with unhedgeable risks. Our proposed framework not only advances financial technology by improving personalized investment advice but also contributes broadly to other fields such as healthcare, economics, and artificial intelligence, where understanding individual preferences is crucial.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

18 of 94 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  2. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  3. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  4. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 247
  5. 2021IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitationcited by 193
  6. 2015Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 176
  7. 2016A Connection between Generative Adversarial Networks, Inverse Reinforcement Learning, and Energy-Based Modelscited by 168
  8. 2021Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningcited by 55
  9. 2022Maximum-Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guaranteescited by 42
  10. 2017Repeated Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  11. 2023A Fisher-Rao gradient flow for entropy-regularised Markov decision processes in Polish spacescited by 23
  12. 2016Towards Resolving Unidentifiability in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
6 more
  1. 2023Identifiability and Generalizability in Constrained Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  2. 2019Robo-advising: Learning Investors' Risk Preferences via Portfolio Choicescited by 7
  3. 2021Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment with Inverse Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  4. 2019Personalized Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment through Client Interactioncited by 6
  5. 2020Me, myself and I: a general theory of non-Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control for sophisticated agentscited by 2
  6. 2024Towards Generalized Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.