mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards a Framework for Openness in Foundation Models: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2405.15802 ↗First posted 17 May 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the past year, there has been a robust debate about the benefits and risks of open sourcing foundation models. However, this discussion has often taken place at a high level of generality or with a narrow focus on specific technical attributes. In part, this is because defining open source for foundation models has proven tricky, given its significant differences from traditional software development. In order to inform more practical and nuanced decisions about opening AI systems, including foundation models, this paper presents a framework for grappling with openness across the AI stack. It summarizes previous work on this topic, analyzes the various potential reasons to pursue openness, and outlines how openness varies in different parts of the AI stack, both at the model and at the system level. In doing so, its authors hope to provide a common descriptive framework to deepen a nuanced and rigorous understanding of openness in AI and enable further work around definitions of openness and safety in AI.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2024.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Modelscited by 64
  2. 2022Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in ML-based Sciencecited by 63
  3. 2024A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teamingcited by 46
  4. 2022The worst of both worlds: A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learningcited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

7 papers.