The Undecidability of Quantified Announcements
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper demonstrates the undecidability of a number of logics with quantification over public announcements: arbitrary public announcement logic (APAL), group announcement logic (GAL), and coalition announcement logic (CAL). In APAL we consider the informative consequences of any announcement, in GAL we consider the informative consequences of a group of agents (this group may be a proper subset of the set of all agents) all of which are simultaneously (and publicly) making known announcements. So this is more restrictive than APAL. Finally, CAL is as GAL except that we now quantify over anything the agents not in that group may announce simultaneously as well. The logic CAL therefore has some features of game logic and of ATL. We show that when there are multiple agents in the language, the satisfiability problem is undecidable for APAL, GAL, and CAL. In the single agent case, the satisfiability problem is decidable for all three logics. This paper corrects an error to the submitted version of Undecidability of Quantified Announcements, identified by Yuta Asami . The nature of the error was in the definition of the formula cga(X) (see Subsection 5.2) which is corrected in this version.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.
- 2025Epistemic Skills: Reasoning about Knowledge and Oblivioncited by 0
- 2025Anonymous Public Announcementscited by 0
- 2025Anonymous Public Announcements17 Apr 2025
- 2025Epistemic Skills: Reasoning about Knowledge and Oblivion2 Apr 2025