mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces

arXiv 2405.15509 ↗First posted 24 May 2024math.OC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work studies discrete-time discounted Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces and addresses the inverse problem of inferring a cost function from observed optimal behavior. We first consider the case in which we have access to the entire expert policy and characterize the set of solutions to the inverse problem by using occupation measures, linear duality, and complementary slackness conditions. To avoid trivial solutions and ill-posedness, we introduce a natural linear normalization constraint. This results in an infinite-dimensional linear feasibility problem, prompting a thorough analysis of its properties. Next, we use linear function approximators and adopt a randomized approach, namely the scenario approach and related probabilistic feasibility guarantees, to derive epsilon-optimal solutions for the inverse problem. We further discuss the sample complexity for a desired approximation accuracy. Finally, we deal with the more realistic case where we only have access to a finite set of expert demonstrations and a generative model and provide bounds on the error made when working with samples.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

25 of 75 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  2. 2018An Algorithmic Perspective on Imitation Learningcited by 455
  3. 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 400
  4. 2021IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for Imitationcited by 191
  5. 2019Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution Matchingcited by 182
  6. 2019Imitation Learning as f-Divergence Minimizationcited by 121
  7. 2021Reward (Mis)design for Autonomous Drivingcited by 102
  8. 2020Reinforcement Learning in Economics and Financecited by 57
  9. 2021Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningcited by 55
  10. 2016Model-Free Imitation Learning with Policy Optimizationcited by 52
  11. 2022Active Exploration for Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
  12. 2022Proximal Point Imitation Learningcited by 25
13 more
  1. 2020Adversarial Soft Advantage Fitting: Imitation Learning without Policy Optimizationcited by 22
  2. 2023Towards Theoretical Understanding of Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  3. 2022Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  4. 2013Performance Bounds for the Scenario Approach and an Extension to a Class of Non-convex Programscited by 9
  5. 2024Offline Inverse RL: New Solution Concepts and Provably Efficient Algorithmscited by 9
  6. 2019On the Correctness and Sample Complexity of Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  7. 2021Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal Guaranteescited by 8
  8. 2021A Lower Bound for the Sample Complexity of Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  9. 2014Maximum Hands-Off Control: A Paradigm of Control Effort Minimizationcited by 6
  10. 2015On the Sample Size of Random Convex Programs with Structured Dependence on the Uncertainty (Extended Version)cited by 4
  11. 2017From Infinite to Finite Programs: Explicit Error Bounds with Applications to Approximate Dynamic Programmingcited by 4
  12. 2014Linear conic optimization for inverse optimal controlcited by 2
  13. 2016Characterization of maximum hands-off controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.