mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Explanations for Linear Optimization

arXiv 2405.15431 ↗First posted 24 May 2024math.OC cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The concept of counterfactual explanations (CE) has emerged as one of the important concepts to understand the inner workings of complex AI systems. In this paper, we translate the idea of CEs to linear optimization and propose, motivate, and analyze three different types of CEs: strong, weak, and relative. While deriving strong and weak CEs appears to be computationally intractable, we show that calculating relative CEs can be done efficiently. By detecting and exploiting the hidden convex structure of the optimization problem that arises in the latter case, we show that obtaining relative CEs can be done in the same magnitude of time as solving the original linear optimization problem. This is confirmed by an extensive numerical experiment study on the NETLIB library.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
  2. 2014From Predictive to Prescriptive Analyticscited by 143
  3. 2021Inverse Optimization: Theory and Applicationscited by 48
  4. 2021Mixed-Integer Optimization with Constraint Learningcited by 31
  5. 2022A Framework for Inherently Interpretable Optimization Modelscited by 8
  6. 2022Counterfactual Explanations Using Optimization With Constraint Learningcited by 8
  7. 2023Explainable Data-Driven Optimization: From Context to Decision and Back Againcited by 7
  8. 2020Automatic Repair of Convex Optimization Problemscited by 3
  9. 2023A Framework for Data-Driven Explainability in Mathematical Optimizationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.