This Too Shall Pass: Removing Stale Observations in Dynamic Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian Optimization (BO) has proven to be very successful at optimizing a static, noisy, costly-to-evaluate black-box function f : S → ℝ. However, optimizing a black-box which is also a function of time (i.e., a dynamic function) f : S × T → ℝ remains a challenge, since a dynamic Bayesian Optimization (DBO) algorithm has to keep track of the optimum over time. This changes the nature of the optimization problem in at least three aspects: (i) querying an arbitrary point in S × T is impossible, (ii) past observations become less and less relevant for keeping track of the optimum as time goes by and (iii) the DBO algorithm must have a high sampling frequency so it can collect enough relevant observations to keep track of the optimum through time. In this paper, we design a Wasserstein distance-based criterion able to quantify the relevancy of an observation with respect to future predictions. Then, we leverage this criterion to build W-DBO, a DBO algorithm able to remove irrelevant observations from its dataset on the fly, thus maintaining simultaneously a good predictive performance and a high sampling frequency, even in continuous-time optimization tasks with unknown horizon. Numerical experiments establish the superiority of W-DBO, which outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a comfortable margin.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2024.
Builds on
14 of 35 references.
References · 14
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 374
- 2015Batch Bayesian Optimization via Local Penalizationcited by 104
- 2021Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization over High-Dimensional Search Spacescited by 87
- 2017Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Flycited by 86
- 2019Adaptive and Safe Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions via One-Dimensional Subspacescited by 73
- 2016Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 50
- 2023Inducing Point Allocation for Sparse Gaussian Processes in High-Throughput Bayesian Optimisationcited by 32
- 2021Weighted Gaussian Process Bandits for Non-stationary Environmentscited by 30
- 2015Bayesian Optimization for Synthetic Gene Designcited by 21
- 2021No-Regret Algorithms for Time-Varying Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19
- 2018Bayesian Optimization for Dynamic Problemscited by 10
- 2023Relaxing the Additivity Constraints in Decentralized No-Regret High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimizationcited by 9
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Time-Varying Bayesian Optimization Without a Metronomecited by 1
- 2026Time-Aware Latent Space Bayesian Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Asymptotic Performance of Time-Varying Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025Symmetry-Aware Bayesian Optimization via Max Kernelscited by 0
- 2026Sharper Regret Bounds for Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandits with Constant Explorationcited by 0
- 2026BOBA: Dynamic Bayesian Optimization through Bayesian Active Inferencecited by 0
- 2026BOBA: Dynamic Bayesian Optimization through Bayesian Active Inference22 Sep 2026
- 2026Sharper Regret Bounds for Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandits with Constant Exploration19 Aug 2026
- 2026Time-Aware Latent Space Bayesian Optimization1 Mar 2026
- 2025Symmetry-Aware Bayesian Optimization via Max Kernels29 Sep 2025
- 2025Asymptotic Performance of Time-Varying Bayesian Optimization19 May 2025
- 2025Time-Varying Bayesian Optimization Without a Metronome31 Jan 2025