mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ECLIPSE: Semantic Entropy-LCS for Cross-Lingual Industrial Log Parsing

arXiv 2405.13548 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.SE cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Log parsing, a vital task for interpreting the vast and complex data produced within software architectures faces significant challenges in the transition from academic benchmarks to the industrial domain. Existing log parsers, while highly effective on standardized public datasets, struggle to maintain performance and efficiency when confronted with the sheer scale and diversity of real-world industrial logs. These challenges are two-fold: 1) massive log templates: The performance and efficiency of most existing parsers will be significantly reduced when logs of growing quantities and different lengths; 2) Complex and changeable semantics: Traditional template-matching algorithms cannot accurately match the log templates of complicated industrial logs because they cannot utilize cross-language logs with similar semantics. To address these issues, we propose ECLIPSE, Enhanced Cross-Lingual Industrial log Parsing with Semantic Entropy-LCS, since cross-language logs can robustly parse industrial logs. On the one hand, it integrates two efficient data-driven template-matching algorithms and Faiss indexing. On the other hand, driven by the powerful semantic understanding ability of the Large Language Model (LLM), the semantics of log keywords were accurately extracted, and the retrieval space was effectively reduced. Notably, we launch a Chinese and English cross-platform industrial log parsing benchmark ECLIPSE- BENCH to evaluate the performance of mainstream parsers in industrial scenarios. Our experimental results across public benchmarks and ECLIPSE- BENCH underscore the superior performance and robustness of our proposed ECLIPSE. Notably, ECLIPSE both delivers state-of-the-art performance when compared to strong baselines and preserves a significant edge in processing efficiency.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

17 of 45 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  6. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,273
  8. 2020A Survey on Automated Log Analysis for Reliability Engineeringcited by 50
  9. 2024xCoT: Cross-lingual Instruction Tuning for Cross-lingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 46
  10. 2023OWL: A Large Language Model for IT Operationscited by 43
  11. 2024mABC: multi-Agent Blockchain-Inspired Collaboration for root cause analysis in micro-services architecturecited by 26
  12. 2022UniParser: A Unified Log Parser for Heterogeneous Log Datacited by 25
5 more
  1. 2020Self-Supervised Log Parsingcited by 23
  2. 2024Lemur: Log Parsing with Entropy Sampling and Chain-of-Thought Mergingcited by 16
  3. 2019Low-Resource Response Generation with Template Priorcited by 9
  4. 2022LogLG: Weakly Supervised Log Anomaly Detection via Log-Event Graph Constructioncited by 8
  5. 2021On Automatic Parsing of Log Recordscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

5 papers.