mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

You don't understand me!: Comparing ASR results for L1 and L2 speakers of Swedish

arXiv 2405.13379 ↗First posted 22 May 2024cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems has constantly increased in state-of-the-art development. However, performance tends to decrease considerably in more challenging conditions (e.g., background noise, multiple speaker social conversations) and with more atypical speakers (e.g., children, non-native speakers or people with speech disorders), which signifies that general improvements do not necessarily transfer to applications that rely on ASR, e.g., educational software for younger students or language learners. In this study, we focus on the gap in performance between recognition results for native and non-native, read and spontaneous, Swedish utterances transcribed by different ASR services. We compare the recognition results using Word Error Rate and analyze the linguistic factors that may generate the observed transcription errors.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.

Builds on

6 of 19 references.

References · 6

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
  3. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
  4. 2017State-of-the-art Speech Recognition With Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 196
  5. 2017English Conversational Telephone Speech Recognition by Humans and Machinescited by 40
  6. 2019A Comparison of Online Automatic Speech Recognition Systems and the Nonverbal Responses to Unintelligible Speechcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

5 papers.