You don't understand me!: Comparing ASR results for L1 and L2 speakers of Swedish
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The performance of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems has constantly increased in state-of-the-art development. However, performance tends to decrease considerably in more challenging conditions (e.g., background noise, multiple speaker social conversations) and with more atypical speakers (e.g., children, non-native speakers or people with speech disorders), which signifies that general improvements do not necessarily transfer to applications that rely on ASR, e.g., educational software for younger students or language learners. In this study, we focus on the gap in performance between recognition results for native and non-native, read and spontaneous, Swedish utterances transcribed by different ASR services. We compare the recognition results using Word Error Rate and analyze the linguistic factors that may generate the observed transcription errors.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2024.
Builds on
6 of 19 references.
References · 6
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
- 2017State-of-the-art Speech Recognition With Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 196
- 2017English Conversational Telephone Speech Recognition by Humans and Machinescited by 40
- 2019A Comparison of Online Automatic Speech Recognition Systems and the Nonverbal Responses to Unintelligible Speechcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2024Measuring the Accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition Solutionscited by 15
- 2026Is Semi-Automatic Transcription Useful in Corpus Creation? Preliminary Considerations on the KIParla Corpuscited by 0
- 2026A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Automatic Speech Recognition Bias in Newcastle Englishcited by 0
- 2026Convex Low-resource Accent-Robust Language Detection in Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2026Linguistic Distance Segregates Latent Representations in Automatic Speech Recognition Systemscited by 0
- 2026Linguistic Distance Segregates Latent Representations in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems31 Aug 2026
- 2026Convex Low-resource Accent-Robust Language Detection in Speech Recognition22 May 2026
- 2026A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Automatic Speech Recognition Bias in Newcastle English25 Mar 2026
- 2026Is Semi-Automatic Transcription Useful in Corpus Creation? Preliminary Considerations on the KIParla Corpus17 Mar 2026
- 2024Measuring the Accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition Solutions29 Aug 2024