mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Influence based explainability of brain tumors segmentation in multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

arXiv 2405.12222 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2024eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years Artificial Intelligence has emerged as a fundamental tool in medical applications. Despite this rapid development, deep neural networks remain black boxes that are difficult to explain, and this represents a major limitation for their use in clinical practice. We focus on the segmentation of medical images task, where most explainability methods proposed so far provide a visual explanation in terms of an input saliency map. The aim of this work is to extend, implement and test instead an influence-based explainability algorithm, TracIn, proposed originally for classification tasks, in a challenging clinical problem, i.e., multiclass segmentation of tumor brains in multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. We verify the faithfulness of the proposed algorithm linking the similarities of the latent representation of the network to the TracIn output. We further test the capacity of the algorithm to provide local and global explanations, and we suggest that it can be adopted as a tool to select the most relevant features used in the decision process. The method is generalizable for all semantic segmentation tasks where classes are mutually exclusive, which is the standard framework in these cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2024.

Builds on

19 of 34 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  5. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  6. 2018Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challengecited by 511
  7. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  8. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
  9. 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
  10. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
  11. 2020The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategiescited by 92
  12. 2022Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvementcited by 48
7 more
  1. 2019How model accuracy and explanation fidelity influence user trustcited by 45
  2. 2021On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations in NLPcited by 30
  3. 2020Reviewing the Need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI)cited by 29
  4. 2020RelatIF: Identifying Explanatory Training Examples via Relative Influencecited by 28
  5. 2022Evaluating Explainable AI on a Multi-Modal Medical Imaging Task: Can Existing Algorithms Fulfill Clinical Requirements?cited by 20
  6. 2021One Map Does Not Fit All: Evaluating Saliency Map Explanation on Multi-Modal Medical Imagescited by 11
  7. 2019Demystifying Brain Tumour Segmentation Networks: Interpretability and Uncertainty Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.