Exploring Commonalities in Explanation Frameworks: A Multi-Domain Survey Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents insights gathered from surveys and discussions with specialists in three domains, aiming to find essential elements for a universal explanation framework that could be applied to these and other similar use cases. The insights are incorporated into a software tool that utilizes GP algorithms, known for their interpretability. The applications analyzed include a medical scenario (involving predictive ML), a retail use case (involving prescriptive ML), and an energy use case (also involving predictive ML). We interviewed professionals from each sector, transcribing their conversations for further analysis. Additionally, experts and non-experts in these fields filled out questionnaires designed to probe various dimensions of explanatory methods. The findings indicate a universal preference for sacrificing a degree of accuracy in favor of greater explainability. Additionally, we highlight the significance of feature importance and counterfactual explanations as critical components of such a framework. Our questionnaires are publicly available to facilitate the dissemination of knowledge in the field of XAI.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2024.
Builds on
4 of 14 references.
References · 4
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2021What Do We Want From Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? -- A Stakeholder Perspective on XAI and a Conceptual Model Guiding Interdisciplinary XAI Researchcited by 119
- 2019Measuring the Quality of Explanations: The System Causability Scale (SCS). Comparing Human and Machine Explanationscited by 64
- 2024Function Class Learning with Genetic Programming: Towards Explainable Meta Learning for Tumor Growth Functionalscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.