Learning Regularities from Data using Spiking Functions: A Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks trained in an end-to-end manner are proven to be efficient in a wide range of machine learning tasks. However, there is one drawback of end-to-end learning: The learned features and information are implicitly represented in neural network parameters, which cannot be used as regularities, concepts or knowledge to explicitly represent the data probability distribution. To resolve this issue, we propose in this paper a new machine learning theory, which defines in mathematics what are regularities. Briefly, regularities are concise representations of the non-random features, or 'non-randomness' in the data probability distribution. Combining this with information theory, we claim that regularities can also be regarded as a small amount of information encoding a large amount of information. Our theory is based on spiking functions. That is, if a function can react to, or spike on specific data samples more frequently than random noise inputs, we say that such a function discovers non-randomness from the data distribution. Also, we say that the discovered non-randomness is encoded into regularities if the function is simple enough. Our theory also discusses applying multiple spiking functions to the same data distribution. In this process, we claim that the 'best' regularities, or the optimal spiking functions, are those who can capture the largest amount of information from the data distribution, and then encode the captured information in the most concise way. Theorems and hypotheses are provided to describe in mathematics what are 'best' regularities and optimal spiking functions. Finally, we propose a machine learning approach, which can potentially obtain the optimal spiking functions regarding the given dataset in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2024.
Builds on
18 of 84 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
6 more
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
- 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 396
- 2018Going Deeper in Spiking Neural Networks: VGG and Residual Architecturescited by 236
- 2020ProphetNet: Predicting Future N-gram for Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 221
- 2022Learning strides in convolutional neural networkscited by 25
Built on by
Not cited yet.