mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Boosting Few-Pixel Robustness Verification via Covering Verification Designs

arXiv 2405.10924 ↗First posted 17 May 2024cs.LG cs.LO cs.PLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proving local robustness is crucial to increase the reliability of neural networks. While many verifiers prove robustness in L_∞ ε-balls, very little work deals with robustness verification in L0 ε-balls, capturing robustness to few pixel attacks. This verification introduces a combinatorial challenge, because the space of pixels to perturb is discrete and of exponential size. A previous work relies on covering designs to identify sets for defining L_∞ neighborhoods, which if proven robust imply that the L0 ε-ball is robust. However, the number of neighborhoods to verify remains very high, leading to a high analysis time. We propose covering verification designs, a combinatorial design that tailors effective but analysis-incompatible coverings to L0 robustness verification. The challenge is that computing a covering verification design introduces a high time and memory overhead, which is intensified in our setting, where multiple candidate coverings are required to identify how to reduce the overall analysis time. We introduce CoVerD, an L0 robustness verifier that selects between different candidate coverings without constructing them, but by predicting their block size distribution. This prediction relies on a theorem providing closed-form expressions for the mean and variance of this distribution. CoVerD constructs the chosen covering verification design on-the-fly, while keeping the memory consumption minimal and enabling to parallelize the analysis. The experimental results show that CoVerD reduces the verification time on average by up to 5.1x compared to prior work and that it scales to larger L0 ε-balls.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 40 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
  6. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  7. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  8. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
  9. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 242
  10. 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
  11. 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
  12. 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 147
9 more
  1. 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 108
  2. 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65
  3. 2021Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Boundscited by 65
  4. 2021Mind the box: l1-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifierscited by 51
  5. 2020Scaling Polyhedral Neural Network Verification on GPUscited by 43
  6. 2016Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural Networks for Malware Classificationcited by 42
  7. 2019Optimization and Abstraction: A Synergistic Approach for Analyzing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 40
  8. 2020Parallelization Techniques for Verifying Neural Networkscited by 36
  9. 2022Boosting Robustness Verification of Semantic Feature Neighborhoodscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.