mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Baseline Results for Selected Nonlinear System Identification Benchmarks

arXiv 2405.10779 ↗First posted 17 May 2024eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nonlinear system identification remains an important open challenge across research and academia. Large numbers of novel approaches are seen published each year, each presenting improvements or extensions to existing methods. It is natural, therefore, to consider how one might choose between these competing models. Benchmark datasets provide one clear way to approach this question. However, to make meaningful inference based on benchmark performance it is important to understand how well a new method performs comparatively to results available with well-established methods. This paper presents a set of ten baseline techniques and their relative performances on five popular benchmarks. The aim of this contribution is to stimulate thought and discussion regarding objective comparison of identification methodologies.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2024.

Builds on

7 of 27 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
  3. 2019Nonlinear System Identification: A User-Oriented Roadmapcited by 55
  4. 2020dynoNet: a neural network architecture for learning dynamical systemscited by 28
  5. 2020Continuous-time system identification with neural networks: Model structures and fitting criteriacited by 28
  6. 2020Nonlinear state-space identification using deep encoder networkscited by 28
  7. 2022Continuous-time identification of dynamic state-space models by deep subspace encodingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.