mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Analysis of AWS Model Deployment Services

arXiv 2405.08175 ↗First posted 13 May 2024cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers three important Model Deployment Services for model developers: SageMaker, Lambda, and Elastic Container Service (ECS). These services have critical advantages and disadvantages, influencing model developer's adoption decisions. This comparative analysis reviews the merits and drawbacks of these services. This analysis found that Lambda AWS service leads in efficiency, autoscaling aspects, and integration during model development. However, ECS was found to be outstanding in terms of flexibility, scalability, and infrastructure control; conversely, ECS is better suited when it comes to managing complex container environments during model development, as well as addressing budget concerns -- it is, therefore, the preferred option for model developers whose objective is to achieve complete freedom and framework flexibility with horizontal scaling. ECS is better suited to ensuring performance requirements align with project goals and constraints. The AWS service selection process considered factors that include but are not limited to load balance and cost-effectiveness. ECS is a better choice when model development begins from the abstract. It offers unique benefits, such as the ability to scale horizontally and vertically, making it the best preferable tool for model deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.

Builds on

3 of 28 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Amazon SageMaker Model Parallelism: A General and Flexible Framework for Large Model Trainingcited by 11
  2. 2020Amazon SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning: Scalable Gradient-Free Optimizationcited by 9
  3. 2021Implementing a scalable and elastic computing environment based on Cloud Containerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.