All Nodes are created Not Equal: Node-Specific Layer Aggregation and Filtration for GNN
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ever-designed Graph Neural Networks, though opening a promising path for the modeling of the graph-structure data, unfortunately introduce two daunting obstacles to their deployment on devices. (I) Most of existing GNNs are shallow, due mostly to the over-smoothing and gradient-vanish problem as they go deeper as convolutional architectures. (II) The vast majority of GNNs adhere to the homophily assumption, where the central node and its adjacent nodes share the same label. This assumption often poses challenges for many GNNs working with heterophilic graphs. Addressing the aforementioned issue has become a looming challenge in enhancing the robustness and scalability of GNN applications. In this paper, we take a comprehensive and systematic approach to overcoming the two aforementioned challenges for the first time. We propose a Node-Specific Layer Aggregation and Filtration architecture, termed NoSAF, a framework capable of filtering and processing information from each individual nodes. NoSAF introduces the concept of "All Nodes are Created Not Equal" into every layer of deep networks, aiming to provide a reliable information filter for each layer's nodes to sieve out information beneficial for the subsequent layer. By incorporating a dynamically updated codebank, NoSAF dynamically optimizes the optimal information outputted downwards at each layer. This effectively overcomes heterophilic issues and aids in deepening the network. To compensate for the information loss caused by the continuous filtering in NoSAF, we also propose NoSAF-D (Deep), which incorporates a compensation mechanism that replenishes information in every layer of the model, allowing NoSAF to perform meaningful computations even in very deep layers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.
Builds on
19 of 71 references.
References · 19
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,382
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 993
- 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 826
- 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 680
- 2020Masked Label Prediction: Unified Message Passing Model for Semi-Supervised Classificationcited by 506
- 2017Representation Learning on Graphs: Methods and Applicationscited by 457
- 2017Deep Gaussian Embedding of Graphs: Unsupervised Inductive Learning via Rankingcited by 335
- 2020SIGN: Scalable Inception Graph Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2020Wiki-CS: A Wikipedia-Based Benchmark for Graph Neural Networkscited by 260
7 more
- 2020DeeperGCN: All You Need to Train Deeper GCNscited by 250
- 2022Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Surveycited by 175
- 2020Graph Information Bottleneck for Subgraph Recognitioncited by 119
- 2024EXGC: Bridging Efficiency and Explainability in Graph Condensationcited by 20
- 2021Towards Deepening Graph Neural Networks: A GNTK-based Optimization Perspectivecited by 14
- 2020Adaptive Graph Diffusion Networkscited by 13
- 2023The Snowflake Hypothesis: Training Deep GNN with One Node One Receptive fieldcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.