Sample Selection Bias in Machine Learning for Healthcare
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While machine learning algorithms hold promise for personalised medicine, their clinical adoption remains limited, partly due to biases that can compromise the reliability of predictions. In this paper, we focus on sample selection bias (SSB), a specific type of bias where the study population is less representative of the target population, leading to biased and potentially harmful decisions. Despite being well-known in the literature, SSB remains scarcely studied in machine learning for healthcare. Moreover, the existing machine learning techniques try to correct the bias mostly by balancing distributions between the study and the target populations, which may result in a loss of predictive performance. To address these problems, our study illustrates the potential risks associated with SSB by examining SSB's impact on the performance of machine learning algorithms. Most importantly, we propose a new research direction for addressing SSB, based on the target population identification rather than the bias correction. Specifically, we propose two independent networks(T-Net) and a multitasking network (MT-Net) for addressing SSB, where one network/task identifies the target subpopulation which is representative of the study population and the second makes predictions for the identified subpopulation. Our empirical results with synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets highlight that SSB can lead to a large drop in the performance of an algorithm for the target population as compared with the study population, as well as a substantial difference in the performance for the target subpopulations that are representative of the selected and the non-selected patients from the study population. Furthermore, our proposed techniques demonstrate robustness across various settings, including different dataset sizes, event rates, and selection rates, outperforming the existing bias correction techniques.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.
Builds on
17 of 83 references.
References · 17
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 156
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 109
- 2023A Brief Review of Hypernetworks in Deep Learningcited by 102
- 2021ADAPT : Awesome Domain Adaptation Python Toolboxcited by 13
- 2023Dynamic Inter-treatment Information Sharing for Individualized Treatment Effects Estimationcited by 11
- 2022Adversarial De-confounding in Individualised Treatment Effects Estimationcited by 9
- 2020Double machine learning for sample selection modelscited by 8
5 more
- 2020Weighted Empirical Risk Minimization: Sample Selection Bias Correction based on Importance Samplingcited by 7
- 2021Fair Regression under Sample Selection Biascited by 3
- 2023A Framework for Understanding Selection Bias in Real-World Healthcare Datacited by 2
- 2019VAT tax gap prediction: a 2-steps Gradient Boosting approachcited by 1
- 2021Sample Selection Bias in Evaluation of Prediction Performance of Causal Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.