MoVL:Exploring Fusion Strategies for the Domain-Adaptive Application of Pretrained Models in Medical Imaging Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Medical images are often more difficult to acquire than natural images due to the specialism of the equipment and technology, which leads to less medical image datasets. So it is hard to train a strong pretrained medical vision model. How to make the best of natural pretrained vision model and adapt in medical domain still pends. For image classification, a popular method is linear probe (LP). However, LP only considers the output after feature extraction. Yet, there exists a gap between input medical images and natural pretrained vision model. We introduce visual prompting (VP) to fill in the gap, and analyze the strategies of coupling between LP and VP. We design a joint learning loss function containing categorisation loss and discrepancy loss, which describe the variance of prompted and plain images, naming this joint training strategy MoVL (Mixture of Visual Prompting and Linear Probe). We experiment on 4 medical image classification datasets, with two mainstream architectures, ResNet and CLIP. Results shows that without changing the parameters and architecture of backbone model and with less parameters, there is potential for MoVL to achieve full finetune (FF) accuracy (on four medical datasets, average 90.91% for MoVL and 91.13% for FF). On out of distribution medical dataset, our method(90.33%) can outperform FF (85.15%) with absolute 5.18 % lead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2024.
Builds on
23 of 31 references.
References · 23
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
11 more
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 682
- 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 564
- 2022MedCLIP: Contrastive Learning from Unpaired Medical Images and Textcited by 564
- 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 271
- 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
- 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
- 2022Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspectivecited by 86
- 2021Extending the WILDS Benchmark for Unsupervised Adaptationcited by 85
- 2022Self Pre-training with Masked Autoencoders for Medical Image Classification and Segmentationcited by 69
- 2022Unleashing the Power of Visual Prompting At the Pixel Levelcited by 37
Built on by
Not cited yet.