Decoding Cognitive Health Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Evaluation for Diagnosis of Significant Memory Concern
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The timely identification of significant memory concern (SMC) is crucial for proactive cognitive health management, especially in an aging population. Detecting SMC early enables timely intervention and personalized care, potentially slowing cognitive disorder progression. This study presents a state-of-the-art review followed by a comprehensive evaluation of machine learning models within the randomized neural networks (RNNs) and hyperplane-based classifiers (HbCs) family to investigate SMC diagnosis thoroughly. Utilizing the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) dataset, 111 individuals with SMC and 111 healthy older adults are analyzed based on T1W magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, extracting rich features. This analysis is based on baseline structural MRI (sMRI) scans, extracting rich features from gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), Jacobian determinant (JD), and cortical thickness (CT) measurements. In RNNs, deep random vector functional link (dRVFL) and ensemble dRVFL (edRVFL) emerge as the best classifiers in terms of performance metrics in the identification of SMC. In HbCs, Kernelized pinball general twin support vector machine (Pin-GTSVM-K) excels in CT and WM features, whereas Linear Pin-GTSVM (Pin-GTSVM-L) and Linear intuitionistic fuzzy TSVM (IFTSVM-L) performs well in the JD and GM features sets, respectively. This comprehensive evaluation emphasizes the critical role of feature selection and model choice in attaining an effective classifier for SMC diagnosis. The inclusion of statistical analyses further reinforces the credibility of the results, affirming the rigor of this analysis. The performance measures exhibit the suitability of this framework in aiding researchers with the automated and accurate assessment of SMC. The source codes of the algorithms and datasets used in this study are available at https://github.com/mtanveer1/SMC.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2024.
Builds on
5 of 84 references.
References · 5
- 2021Ensemble deep learning: A reviewcited by 283
- 2022Random vector functional link network: recent developments, applications, and future directionscited by 33
- 2019Random Vector Functional Link Neural Network based Ensemble Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2023Graph Embedded Intuitionistic Fuzzy Random Vector Functional Link Neural Network for Class Imbalance Learningcited by 14
- 2022Automated detection of Alzheimer disease using MRI images and deep neural networks- A reviewcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Multiview learning with twin parametric margin SVMcited by 8
- 2024Wave-RVFL: A Randomized Neural Network Based on Wave Loss Functioncited by 7
- 2025One Class Restricted Kernel Machinescited by 5
- 2024Enhanced Feature Based Granular Ball Twin Support Vector Machinecited by 2
- 2025RVFL-X: A Novel Randomized Network Based on Complex Transformed Real-Valued Tabular Datasetscited by 2
- 2026Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN Optimization1 Aug 2026
- 2025RVFL-X: A Novel Randomized Network Based on Complex Transformed Real-Valued Tabular Datasets6 Oct 2025
- 2025One Class Restricted Kernel Machines11 Feb 2025
- 2024Enhanced Feature Based Granular Ball Twin Support Vector Machine8 Oct 2024
- 2024Wave-RVFL: A Randomized Neural Network Based on Wave Loss Function5 Aug 2024
- 2024Multiview learning with twin parametric margin SVM4 Aug 2024