Fractals as Pre-training Datasets for Anomaly Detection and Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Anomaly detection is crucial in large-scale industrial manufacturing as it helps detect and localise defective parts. Pre-training feature extractors on large-scale datasets is a popular approach for this task. Stringent data security and privacy regulations and high costs and acquisition time hinder the availability and creation of such large datasets. While recent work in anomaly detection primarily focuses on the development of new methods built on such extractors, the importance of the data used for pre-training has not been studied. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of eight state-of-the-art methods pre-trained using dynamically generated fractal images on the famous benchmark datasets MVTec and VisA. In contrast to existing literature, which predominantly examines the transfer-learning capabilities of fractals, in this study, we compare models pre-trained with fractal images against those pre-trained with ImageNet, without subsequent fine-tuning. Although pre-training with ImageNet remains a clear winner, the results of fractals are promising considering that the anomaly detection task required features capable of discerning even minor visual variations. This opens up the possibility for a new research direction where feature extractors could be trained on synthetically generated abstract datasets reconciling the ever-increasing demand for data in machine learning while circumventing privacy and security concerns.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2024.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
- 2020PaDiM: a Patch Distribution Modeling Framework for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 591
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2022Anomaly Detection via Reverse Distillation from One-Class Embeddingcited by 419
- 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 397
- 2017Future Frame Prediction for Anomaly Detection -- A New Baselinecited by 391
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
13 more
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2021CFLOW-AD: Real-Time Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Localization via Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 320
- 2021FastFlow: Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localization via 2D Normalizing Flowscited by 225
- 2020PANDA: Adapting Pretrained Features for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 175
- 2021The MVTec 3D-AD Dataset for Unsupervised 3D Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 174
- 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 145
- 2022CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based Feature Adaptation for Target-Oriented Anomaly Localizationcited by 135
- 2021Pre-training without Natural Imagescited by 100
- 2022Anomalib: A Deep Learning Library for Anomaly Detectioncited by 75
- 2023IM-IAD: Industrial Image Anomaly Detection Benchmark in Manufacturingcited by 64
- 2023ReContrast: Domain-Specific Anomaly Detection via Contrastive Reconstructioncited by 62
- 2021Improving Fractal Pre-trainingcited by 26
- 2018Are pre-trained CNNs good feature extractors for anomaly detection in surveillance videos?cited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.