Disrupting Style Mimicry Attacks on Video Imagery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI models are often used to perform mimicry attacks, where a pretrained model is fine-tuned on a small sample of images to learn to mimic a specific artist of interest. While researchers have introduced multiple anti-mimicry protection tools (Mist, Glaze, Anti-Dreambooth), recent evidence points to a growing trend of mimicry models using videos as sources of training data. This paper presents our experiences exploring techniques to disrupt style mimicry on video imagery. We first validate that mimicry attacks can succeed by training on individual frames extracted from videos. We show that while anti-mimicry tools can offer protection when applied to individual frames, this approach is vulnerable to an adaptive countermeasure that removes protection by exploiting randomness in optimization results of consecutive (nearly-identical) frames. We develop a new, tool-agnostic framework that segments videos into short scenes based on frame-level similarity, and use a per-scene optimization baseline to remove inter-frame randomization while reducing computational cost. We show via both image level metrics and an end-to-end user study that the resulting protection restores protection against mimicry (including the countermeasure). Finally, we develop another adaptive countermeasure and find that it falls short against our framework.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2024.
Builds on
12 of 43 references.
References · 12
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2022DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generationcited by 3,300
- 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,581
- 2022An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversioncited by 2,245
- 2020Softmax Splatting for Video Frame Interpolationcited by 279
- 2019Depth-Aware Video Frame Interpolationcited by 234
- 2016The THUMOS Challenge on Action Recognition for Videos "in the Wild"cited by 213
- 2023Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Modelscited by 205
- 2023Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examplescited by 167
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Dormant: Defending against Pose-driven Human Image Animationcited by 11
- 2026Delving into the Temporal Challenges of Unified Video Protection Against Image-to-Video and Fine-Tuning-based Customizationcited by 5
- 2025Combating Falsification of Speech Videos with Live Optical Signatures (Extended Version)cited by 1
- 2026Delving into the Temporal Challenges of Unified Video Protection Against Image-to-Video and Fine-Tuning-based Customization14 Jul 2026
- 2025Combating Falsification of Speech Videos with Live Optical Signatures (Extended Version)30 Apr 2025
- 2024Dormant: Defending against Pose-driven Human Image Animation22 Sep 2024