mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging the Gap: Protocol Towards Fair and Consistent Affect Analysis

arXiv 2405.06841 ↗First posted 10 May 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing integration of machine learning algorithms in daily life underscores the critical need for fairness and equity in their deployment. As these technologies play a pivotal role in decision-making, addressing biases across diverse subpopulation groups, including age, gender, and race, becomes paramount. Automatic affect analysis, at the intersection of physiology, psychology, and machine learning, has seen significant development. However, existing databases and methodologies lack uniformity, leading to biased evaluations. This work addresses these issues by analyzing six affective databases, annotating demographic attributes, and proposing a common protocol for database partitioning. Emphasis is placed on fairness in evaluations. Extensive experiments with baseline and state-of-the-art methods demonstrate the impact of these changes, revealing the inadequacy of prior assessments. The findings underscore the importance of considering demographic attributes in affect analysis research and provide a foundation for more equitable methodologies. Our annotations, code and pre-trained models are available at: https://github.com/dkollias/Fair-Consistent-Affect-Analysis

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.