ADSumm: Annotated Ground-truth Summary Datasets for Disaster Tweet Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online social media platforms, such as Twitter, provide valuable information during disaster events. Existing tweet disaster summarization approaches provide a summary of these events to aid government agencies, humanitarian organizations, etc., to ensure effective disaster response. In the literature, there are two types of approaches for disaster summarization, namely, supervised and unsupervised approaches. Although supervised approaches are typically more effective, they necessitate a sizable number of disaster event summaries for testing and training. However, there is a lack of good number of disaster summary datasets for training and evaluation. This motivates us to add more datasets to make supervised learning approaches more efficient. In this paper, we present ADSumm, which adds annotated ground-truth summaries for eight disaster events which consist of both natural and man-made disaster events belonging to seven different countries. Our experimental analysis shows that the newly added datasets improve the performance of the supervised summarization approaches by 8-28% in terms of ROUGE-N F1-score. Moreover, in newly annotated dataset, we have added a category label for each input tweet which helps to ensure good coverage from different categories in summary. Additionally, we have added two other features relevance label and key-phrase, which provide information about the quality of a tweet and explanation about the inclusion of the tweet into summary, respectively. For ground-truth summary creation, we provide the annotation procedure adapted in detail, which has not been described in existing literature. Experimental analysis shows the quality of ground-truth summary is very good with Coverage, Relevance and Diversity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2024.
Builds on
18 of 91 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 553
- 2018CrisisMMD: Multimodal Twitter Datasets from Natural Disasterscited by 88
- 2023Extractive Summarization via ChatGPT for Faithful Summary Generationcited by 58
- 2016Twitter as a Lifeline: Human-annotated Twitter Corpora for NLP of Crisis-related Messagescited by 43
- 2021HumAID: Human-Annotated Disaster Incidents Data from Twitter with Deep Learning Benchmarkscited by 38
- 2022CAVES: A Dataset to facilitate Explainable Classification and Summarization of Concerns towards COVID Vaccinescited by 16
- 2019Unsupervised Detection of Sub-events in Large Scale Disasterscited by 11
- 2020Utilizing Microblogs for Assisting Post-Disaster Relief Operations via Matching Resource Needs and Availabilitiescited by 8
- 2018empathi: An ontology for Emergency Managing and Planning about Hazard Crisiscited by 6
- 2023RweetMiner: Automatic identification and categorization of help requests on twitter during disasterscited by 5
6 more
- 2022OntoDSumm : Ontology based Tweet Summarization for Disaster Eventscited by 4
- 2022EnDSUM: Entropy and Diversity based Disaster Tweet Summarizationcited by 4
- 2023PORTRAIT: a hybrid aPproach tO cReate extractive ground-TRuth summAry for dIsaster evenTcited by 3
- 2023IKDSumm: Incorporating Key-phrases into BERT for extractive Disaster Tweet Summarizationcited by 3
- 2013Word Storms: Multiples of Word Clouds for Visual Comparison of Documentscited by 2
- 2024TONE: A 3-Tiered ONtology for Emotion analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.