Exploring the Interplay of Interpretability and Robustness in Deep Neural Networks: A Saliency-guided Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks pose a significant challenge to deploying deep learning models in safety-critical applications. Maintaining model robustness while ensuring interpretability is vital for fostering trust and comprehension in these models. This study investigates the impact of Saliency-guided Training (SGT) on model robustness, a technique aimed at improving the clarity of saliency maps to deepen understanding of the model's decision-making process. Experiments were conducted on standard benchmark datasets using various deep learning architectures trained with and without SGT. Findings demonstrate that SGT enhances both model robustness and interpretability. Additionally, we propose a novel approach combining SGT with standard adversarial training to achieve even greater robustness while preserving saliency map quality. Our strategy is grounded in the assumption that preserving salient features crucial for correctly classifying adversarial examples enhances model robustness, while masking non-relevant features improves interpretability. Our technique yields significant gains, achieving a 35% and 20% improvement in robustness against PGD attack with noise magnitudes of 0.2 and 0.02 for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, respectively, while producing high-quality saliency maps.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2024.
Builds on
10 of 21 references.
References · 10
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 982
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
- 2022ROOM: Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks Under Real-Time Constraintscited by 5
- 2022Saliency Guided Adversarial Training for Learning Generalizable Features with Applications to Medical Imaging Classification Systemcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superpositioncited by 13
- 2024Navigating Threats: A Survey of Physical Adversarial Attacks on LiDAR Perception Systems in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
- 2025H-SPLID: HSIC-based Saliency Preserving Latent Information Decompositioncited by 2
- 2025A Survey of Adversarial Defenses in Vision-based Systems: Categorization, Methods and Challengescited by 1
- 2026Explanation-Guided Adversarial Training for Robust and Interpretable Modelscited by 1
- 2025Are Inherently Interpretable Models More Robust? A Study In Music Emotion Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025From Attribution to Action: Jointly ALIGNing Predictions and Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Explanation-Guided Adversarial Training for Robust and Interpretable Models2 Mar 2026
- 2025From Attribution to Action: Jointly ALIGNing Predictions and Explanations10 Nov 2025
- 2025H-SPLID: HSIC-based Saliency Preserving Latent Information Decomposition23 Oct 2025
- 2025Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition24 Aug 2025
- 2025Are Inherently Interpretable Models More Robust? A Study In Music Emotion Recognition5 Aug 2025
- 2025A Survey of Adversarial Defenses in Vision-based Systems: Categorization, Methods and Challenges1 Mar 2025
- 2024Navigating Threats: A Survey of Physical Adversarial Attacks on LiDAR Perception Systems in Autonomous Vehicles30 Sep 2024