Selective Fine-tuning on LLM-labeled Data May Reduce Reliance on Human Annotation: A Case Study Using Schedule-of-Event Table Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their efficacy across a broad spectrum of tasks in healthcare applications. However, often LLMs need to be fine-tuned on task-specific expert annotated data to achieve optimal performance, which can be expensive and time consuming. In this study, we fine-tune PaLM-2 with parameter efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using noisy labels obtained from gemini-pro 1.0 for the detection of Schedule-of-Event (SoE) tables, which specify care plan in clinical trial protocols. We introduce a filtering mechanism to select high-confidence labels for this table classification task, thereby reducing the noise in the auto-generated labels. We show that fine-tuned PaLM-2 with those labels achieves performance that exceeds the gemini-pro 1.0 and other LLMs. Furthermore, its performance is close to a PaLM-2 fine-tuned on labels obtained from non-expert annotators. Our results show that leveraging LLM-generated labels through powerful models like gemini-pro can potentially serve as a viable strategy for improving LLM performance through fine-tuning in specialized tasks, particularly in domains where expert annotations are scarce, expensive, or time-consuming to obtain.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2024.
Builds on
11 of 32 references.
References · 11
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2023Towards Generalist Biomedical AIcited by 289
- 2022Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language Understandingcited by 199
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 187
- 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 100
- 2024Towards Conversational Diagnostic AIcited by 79
- 2019This dataset does not exist: training models from generated imagescited by 65
- 2023Jointly Extracting Interventions, Outcomes, and Findings from RCT Reports with LLMscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2024Automated Collection of Evaluation Dataset for Semantic Search in Low-Resource Domain Languagecited by 4
- 2025Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmarkcited by 4
- 2026The Last Mile of Coding Agents for Long-Document Tasks: An Empirical Study on Clinical Trial Protocol Digitizationcited by 0
- 2026The Last Mile of Coding Agents for Long-Document Tasks: An Empirical Study on Clinical Trial Protocol Digitization13 Oct 2026
- 2025Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmark14 Jun 2025
- 2024Automated Collection of Evaluation Dataset for Semantic Search in Low-Resource Domain Language13 Dec 2024