How Inverse Conditional Flows Can Serve as a Substitute for Distributional Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural network representations of simple models, such as linear regression, are being studied increasingly to better understand the underlying principles of deep learning algorithms. However, neural representations of distributional regression models, such as the Cox model, have received little attention so far. We close this gap by proposing a framework for distributional regression using inverse flow transformations (DRIFT), which includes neural representations of the aforementioned models. We empirically demonstrate that the neural representations of models in DRIFT can serve as a substitute for their classical statistical counterparts in several applications involving continuous, ordered, time-series, and survival outcomes. We confirm that models in DRIFT empirically match the performance of several statistical methods in terms of estimation of partial effects, prediction, and aleatoric uncertainty quantification. DRIFT covers both interpretable statistical models and flexible neural networks opening up new avenues in both statistical modeling and deep learning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.
Builds on
25 of 72 references.
References · 25
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
- 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
- 2019Residual Flows for Invertible Generative Modelingcited by 257
- 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 208
- 2019Learning Likelihoods with Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 172
- 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
- 2020GAMI-Net: An Explainable Neural Network based on Generalized Additive Models with Structured Interactionscited by 82
- 2016Label-Free Supervision of Neural Networks with Physics and Domain Knowledgecited by 74
13 more
- 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
- 2020Semi-Structured Distributional Regression -- Extending Structured Additive Models by Arbitrary Deep Neural Networks and Data Modalitiescited by 24
- 2020Deep Conditional Transformation Modelscited by 23
- 2020Deep transformation models: Tackling complex regression problems with neural network based transformation modelscited by 18
- 2022DeepPAMM: Deep Piecewise Exponential Additive Mixed Models for Complex Hazard Structures in Survival Analysiscited by 12
- 2023A New PHO-rmula for Improved Performance of Semi-Structured Networkscited by 11
- 2022Deep Learning meets Nonparametric Regression: Are Weight-Decayed DNNs Locally Adaptive?cited by 10
- 2021Probabilistic Time Series Forecasts with Autoregressive Transformation Modelscited by 7
- 2021Robust normalizing flows using Bernstein-type polynomialscited by 6
- 2019How Implicit Regularization of ReLU Neural Networks Characterizes the Learned Function -- Part I: the 1-D Case of Two Layers with Random First Layercited by 5
- 2021Individual Survival Curves with Conditional Normalizing Flowscited by 4
- 2022Distribution-Free Location-Scale Regressioncited by 3
- 2022When Are Scoring Rules Proper? Bridging Theory and Practice in Survival Model Evaluationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.