Full Stage Learning to Rank: A Unified Framework for Multi-Stage Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Probability Ranking Principle (PRP) has been considered as the foundational standard in the design of information retrieval (IR) systems. The principle requires an IR module's returned list of results to be ranked with respect to the underlying user interests, so as to maximize the results' utility. Nevertheless, we point out that it is inappropriate to indiscriminately apply PRP through every stage of a contemporary IR system. Such systems contain multiple stages (e.g., retrieval, pre-ranking, ranking, and re-ranking stages, as examined in this paper). The selection bias inherent in the model of each stage significantly influences the results that are ultimately presented to users. To address this issue, we propose an improved ranking principle for multi-stage systems, namely the Generalized Probability Ranking Principle (GPRP), to emphasize both the selection bias in each stage of the system pipeline as well as the underlying interest of users. We realize GPRP via a unified algorithmic framework named Full Stage Learning to Rank. Our core idea is to first estimate the selection bias in the subsequent stages and then learn a ranking model that best complies with the downstream modules' selection bias so as to deliver its top ranked results to the final ranked list in the system's output. We performed extensive experiment evaluations of our developed Full Stage Learning to Rank solution, using both simulations and online A/B tests in one of the leading short-video recommendation platforms. The algorithm is proved to be effective in both retrieval and ranking stages. Since deployed, the algorithm has brought consistent and significant performance gain to the platform.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5.
7 papers.
- 2024Scaling Laws for Online Advertisement Retrievalcited by 3
- 2025Differentiable Fast Top-K Selection for Large-Scale Recommendationcited by 3
- 2025Learning Cascade Ranking as One Networkcited by 2
- 2024CRM: Retrieval Model with Controllable Conditioncited by 1
- 2025Bidding-Aware Retrieval for Multi-Stage Consistency in Online Advertisingcited by 0
- 2025Online Two-Stage Submodular Maximizationcited by 0
- 2025CroPS: Improving Dense Retrieval with Cross-Perspective Positive Samples in Short-Video Searchcited by 0
- 2025CroPS: Improving Dense Retrieval with Cross-Perspective Positive Samples in Short-Video Search19 Nov 2025
- 2025Online Two-Stage Submodular Maximization22 Oct 2025
- 2025Differentiable Fast Top-K Selection for Large-Scale Recommendation13 Oct 2025
- 2025Bidding-Aware Retrieval for Multi-Stage Consistency in Online Advertising7 Aug 2025
- 2025Learning Cascade Ranking as One Network12 Mar 2025
- 2024CRM: Retrieval Model with Controllable Condition18 Dec 2024
- 2024Scaling Laws for Online Advertisement Retrieval20 Nov 2024