AttacKG+:Boosting Attack Knowledge Graph Construction with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attack knowledge graph construction seeks to convert textual cyber threat intelligence (CTI) reports into structured representations, portraying the evolutionary traces of cyber attacks. Even though previous research has proposed various methods to construct attack knowledge graphs, they generally suffer from limited generalization capability to diverse knowledge types as well as requirement of expertise in model design and tuning. Addressing these limitations, we seek to utilize Large Language Models (LLMs), which have achieved enormous success in a broad range of tasks given exceptional capabilities in both language understanding and zero-shot task fulfillment. Thus, we propose a fully automatic LLM-based framework to construct attack knowledge graphs named: AttacKG+. Our framework consists of four consecutive modules: rewriter, parser, identifier, and summarizer, each of which is implemented by instruction prompting and in-context learning empowered by LLMs. Furthermore, we upgrade the existing attack knowledge schema and propose a comprehensive version. We represent a cyber attack as a temporally unfolding event, each temporal step of which encapsulates three layers of representation, including behavior graph, MITRE TTP labels, and state summary. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that: 1) our formulation seamlessly satisfies the information needs in threat event analysis, 2) our construction framework is effective in faithfully and accurately extracting the information defined by AttacKG+, and 3) our attack graph directly benefits downstream security practices such as attack reconstruction. All the code and datasets will be released upon acceptance.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2024.
Builds on
8 of 21 references.
References · 8
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021AttacKG: Constructing Technique Knowledge Graph from Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 31
- 2021EXTRACTOR: Extracting Attack Behavior from Threat Reportscited by 19
- 2023Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environmentscited by 18
- 2023Fundamentals of Generative Large Language Models and Perspectives in Cyber-Defensecited by 13
- 2022ThreatKG: An AI-Powered System for Automated Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence Gathering and Managementcited by 9
- 2023LLMs Perform Poorly at Concept Extraction in Cyber-security Research Literaturecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024iText2KG: Incremental Knowledge Graphs Construction Using Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2026Does Runtime Topology Context Improve LLM-Generated Kubernetes Security Patches?cited by 2
- 2026Ranked by the Matcher: A Reproducibility Audit of Knowledge Graph Extraction from Threat Reportscited by 0
- 2026Ranked by the Matcher: A Reproducibility Audit of Knowledge Graph Extraction from Threat Reports1 Sep 2026
- 2026Does Runtime Topology Context Improve LLM-Generated Kubernetes Security Patches?28 Jul 2026
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2024iText2KG: Incremental Knowledge Graphs Construction Using Large Language Models5 Sep 2024