mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combating Concept Drift with Explanatory Detection and Adaptation for Android Malware Classification

arXiv 2405.04095 ↗First posted 7 May 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning-based Android malware classifiers achieve high accuracy in stationary environments but struggle with concept drift. The rapid evolution of malware, especially with new families, can depress classification accuracy to near-random levels. Previous research has largely centered on detecting drift samples, with expert-led label revisions on these samples to guide model retraining. However, these methods often lack a comprehensive understanding of malware concepts and provide limited guidance for effective drift adaptation, leading to unstable detection performance and high human labeling costs. To combat concept drift, we propose DREAM, a novel system that improves drift detection and establishes an explanatory adaptation process. Our core idea is to integrate classifier and expert knowledge within a unified model. To achieve this, we embed malware explanations (or concepts) within the latent space of a contrastive autoencoder, while constraining sample reconstruction based on classifier predictions. This approach enhances classifier retraining in two key ways: 1) capturing the target classifier's characteristics to select more effective samples in drift detection and 2) enabling concept revisions that extend the classifier's semantics to provide stronger guidance for adaptation. Additionally, DREAM eliminates reliance on training data during real-time drift detection and provides a behavior-based drift explainer to support concept revision. Our evaluation shows that DREAM effectively improves the drift detection accuracy and reduces the expert analysis effort in adaptation across different malware datasets and classifiers. Notably, when updating a widely-used Drebin classifier, DREAM achieves the same accuracy with 76.6% fewer newly labeled samples compared to the best existing methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2024.

Builds on

13 of 82 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
  5. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  6. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  7. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
  8. 2019Evaluating Explanation Methods for Deep Learning in Securitycited by 38
  9. 2017Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Malware Analysiscited by 31
  10. 2016MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral Modelscited by 29
  11. 2023FINER: Enhancing State-of-the-art Classifiers with Feature Attribution to Facilitate Security Analysiscited by 12
  12. 2022Fast & Furious: Modelling Malware Detection as Evolving Data Streamscited by 6
1 more
  1. 2022DeUEDroid: Detecting Underground Economy Apps Based on UTG Similaritycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.