Your Network May Need to Be Rewritten: Network Adversarial Based on High-Dimensional Function Graph Decomposition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the past, research on a single low dimensional activation function in networks has led to internal covariate shift and gradient deviation problems. A relatively small research area is how to use function combinations to provide property completion for a single activation function application. We propose a network adversarial method to address the aforementioned challenges. This is the first method to use different activation functions in a network. Based on the existing activation functions in the current network, an adversarial function with opposite derivative image properties is constructed, and the two are alternately used as activation functions for different network layers. For complex situations, we propose a method of high-dimensional function graph decomposition(HD-FGD), which divides it into different parts and then passes through a linear layer. After integrating the inverse of the partial derivatives of each decomposed term, we obtain its adversarial function by referring to the computational rules of the decomposition process. The use of network adversarial methods or the use of HD-FGD alone can effectively replace the traditional MLP+activation function mode. Through the above methods, we have achieved a substantial improvement over standard activation functions regarding both training efficiency and predictive accuracy. The article addresses the adversarial issues associated with several prevalent activation functions, presenting alternatives that can be seamlessly integrated into existing models without any adverse effects. We will release the code as open source after the conference review process is completed.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2024.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
- 2016Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 1,204
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
- 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
8 more
- 2019Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Ratecited by 183
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 155
- 2014Learning Activation Functions to Improve Deep Neural Networkscited by 63
- 2016Parametric Exponential Linear Unit for Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 32
- 2021CLIP: Cheap Lipschitz Training of Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2019Is it Time to Swish? Comparing Deep Learning Activation Functions Across NLP taskscited by 9
- 2019Natural-Logarithm-Rectified Activation Function in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2019L*ReLU: Piece-wise Linear Activation Functions for Deep Fine-grained Visual Categorizationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.