Rad4XCNN: a new agnostic method for post-hoc global explanation of CNN-derived features by means of radiomics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have played a key role in the analysis of several medical conditions. Despite their promising capabilities, the lack of transparency in AI models poses significant challenges, particularly in medical contexts where reliability is a mandatory aspect. However, it appears that explainability is inversely proportional to accuracy. For this reason, achieving transparency without compromising predictive accuracy remains a key challenge. This paper presents a novel method, namely Rad4XCNN, to enhance the predictive power of CNN-derived features with the inherent interpretability of radiomic features. Rad4XCNN diverges from conventional methods based on saliency maps, by associating intelligible meaning to CNN-derived features by means of Radiomics, offering new perspectives on explanation methods beyond visualization maps. Using a breast cancer classification task as a case study, we evaluated Rad4XCNN on ultrasound imaging datasets, including an online dataset and two in-house datasets for internal and external validation. Some key results are: i) CNN-derived features guarantee more robust accuracy when compared against ViT-derived and radiomic features; ii) conventional visualization map methods for explanation present several pitfalls; iii) Rad4XCNN does not sacrifice model accuracy for their explainability; iv) Rad4XCNN provides a global explanation enabling the physician to extract global insights and findings. Our method can mitigate some concerns related to the explainability-accuracy trade-off. This study highlighted the importance of proposing new methods for model explanation without affecting their accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.
Builds on
18 of 81 references.
References · 18
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
- 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
- 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
6 more
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
- 2020Deep Learning COVID-19 Features on CXR using Limited Training Data Setscited by 68
- 2016Image biomarker standardisation initiativecited by 61
- 2021Explainable Medical Imaging AI Needs Human-Centered Design: Guidelines and Evidence from a Systematic Reviewcited by 30
- 2023Is attention all you need in medical image analysis? A reviewcited by 12
- 2020A Survey of Methods for Managing the Classification and Solution of Data Imbalance Problemcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.