mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rad4XCNN: a new agnostic method for post-hoc global explanation of CNN-derived features by means of radiomics

arXiv 2405.02334 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have played a key role in the analysis of several medical conditions. Despite their promising capabilities, the lack of transparency in AI models poses significant challenges, particularly in medical contexts where reliability is a mandatory aspect. However, it appears that explainability is inversely proportional to accuracy. For this reason, achieving transparency without compromising predictive accuracy remains a key challenge. This paper presents a novel method, namely Rad4XCNN, to enhance the predictive power of CNN-derived features with the inherent interpretability of radiomic features. Rad4XCNN diverges from conventional methods based on saliency maps, by associating intelligible meaning to CNN-derived features by means of Radiomics, offering new perspectives on explanation methods beyond visualization maps. Using a breast cancer classification task as a case study, we evaluated Rad4XCNN on ultrasound imaging datasets, including an online dataset and two in-house datasets for internal and external validation. Some key results are: i) CNN-derived features guarantee more robust accuracy when compared against ViT-derived and radiomic features; ii) conventional visualization map methods for explanation present several pitfalls; iii) Rad4XCNN does not sacrifice model accuracy for their explainability; iv) Rad4XCNN provides a global explanation enabling the physician to extract global insights and findings. Our method can mitigate some concerns related to the explainability-accuracy trade-off. This study highlighted the importance of proposing new methods for model explanation without affecting their accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2024.

Builds on

18 of 81 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  4. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  7. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  9. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  10. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  11. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  12. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 188
6 more
  1. 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
  2. 2020Deep Learning COVID-19 Features on CXR using Limited Training Data Setscited by 68
  3. 2016Image biomarker standardisation initiativecited by 61
  4. 2021Explainable Medical Imaging AI Needs Human-Centered Design: Guidelines and Evidence from a Systematic Reviewcited by 30
  5. 2023Is attention all you need in medical image analysis? A reviewcited by 12
  6. 2020A Survey of Methods for Managing the Classification and Solution of Data Imbalance Problemcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.