mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

YOLOv5 vs. YOLOv8 in Marine Fisheries: Balancing Class Detection and Instance Count

arXiv 2405.02312 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2024cs.CV eess.IVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a comparative study of object detection using YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for three distinct classes: artemia, cyst, and excrement. In this comparative study, we analyze the performance of these models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, etc. where YOLOv5 often performed better in detecting Artemia and cysts with excellent precision and accuracy. However, when it came to detecting excrement, YOLOv5 faced notable challenges and limitations. This suggests that YOLOv8 offers greater versatility and adaptability in detection tasks while YOLOv5 may struggle in difficult situations and may need further fine-tuning or specialized training to enhance its performance. The results show insights into the suitability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 for detecting objects in challenging marine environments, with implications for applications such as ecological research.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.

Builds on

3 of 12 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  2. 2023DeepSeaNet: Improving Underwater Object Detection using EfficientDetcited by 6
  3. 2022UTD-Yolov5: A Real-time Underwater Targets Detection Method based on Attention Improved YOLOv5cited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.