mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Attack to Defense: Insights into Deep Learning Security Measures in Black-Box Settings

arXiv 2405.01963 ↗First posted 3 May 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep Learning (DL) is rapidly maturing to the point that it can be used in safety- and security-crucial applications. However, adversarial samples, which are undetectable to the human eye, pose a serious threat that can cause the model to misbehave and compromise the performance of such applications. Addressing the robustness of DL models has become crucial to understanding and defending against adversarial attacks. In this study, we perform comprehensive experiments to examine the effect of adversarial attacks and defenses on various model architectures across well-known datasets. Our research focuses on black-box attacks such as SimBA, HopSkipJump, MGAAttack, and boundary attacks, as well as preprocessor-based defensive mechanisms, including bits squeezing, median smoothing, and JPEG filter. Experimenting with various models, our results demonstrate that the level of noise needed for the attack increases as the number of layers increases. Moreover, the attack success rate decreases as the number of layers increases. This indicates that model complexity and robustness have a significant relationship. Investigating the diversity and robustness relationship, our experiments with diverse models show that having a large number of parameters does not imply higher robustness. Our experiments extend to show the effects of the training dataset on model robustness. Using various datasets such as ImageNet-1000, CIFAR-100, and CIFAR-10 are used to evaluate the black-box attacks. Considering the multiple dimensions of our analysis, e.g., model complexity and training dataset, we examined the behavior of black-box attacks when models apply defenses. Our results show that applying defense strategies can significantly reduce attack effectiveness. This research provides in-depth analysis and insight into the robustness of DL models against various attacks, and defenses.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2024.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  6. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
  7. 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 546
  8. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 486
  9. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 462
  10. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 333
  11. 2019Simple Black-box Adversarial Attackscited by 251
  12. 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 197
5 more
  1. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  2. 2017DolphinAtack: Inaudible Voice Commandscited by 69
  3. 2018Analysis of adversarial attacks against CNN-based image forgery detectorscited by 5
  4. 2021Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on ImageNet: A Reality Check on Misclassification Classescited by 3
  5. 2023Unveiling Vulnerabilities in Interpretable Deep Learning Systems with Query-Efficient Black-box Attackscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.