mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Text and Audio Simplification: Human vs. ChatGPT

arXiv 2405.01592 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text and audio simplification to increase information comprehension are important in healthcare. With the introduction of ChatGPT, an evaluation of its simplification performance is needed. We provide a systematic comparison of human and ChatGPT simplified texts using fourteen metrics indicative of text difficulty. We briefly introduce our online editor where these simplification tools, including ChatGPT, are available. We scored twelve corpora using our metrics: six text, one audio, and five ChatGPT simplified corpora. We then compare these corpora with texts simplified and verified in a prior user study. Finally, a medical domain expert evaluated these texts and five, new ChatGPT simplified versions. We found that simple corpora show higher similarity with the human simplified texts. ChatGPT simplification moves metrics in the right direction. The medical domain expert evaluation showed a preference for the ChatGPT style, but the text itself was rated lower for content retention.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

Builds on

1 of 20 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022Evaluating Factuality in Text Simplificationcited by 34

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.