mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Image segmentation of treated and untreated tumor spheroids by Fully Convolutional Networks

arXiv 2405.01105 ↗First posted 2 May 2024cs.CV q-bio.QM q-bio.TOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTS) are advanced cell culture systems for assessing the impact of combinatorial radio(chemo)therapy. They exhibit therapeutically relevant in-vivo-like characteristics from 3D cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to radial pathophysiological gradients related to proliferative activity and nutrient/oxygen supply, altering cellular radioresponse. State-of-the-art assays quantify long-term curative endpoints based on collected brightfield image time series from large treated spheroid populations per irradiation dose and treatment arm. Here, spheroid control probabilities are documented analogous to in-vivo tumor control probabilities based on Kaplan-Meier curves. This analyses require laborious spheroid segmentation of up to 100.000 images per treatment arm to extract relevant structural information from the images, e.g., diameter, area, volume and circularity. While several image analysis algorithms are available for spheroid segmentation, they all focus on compact MCTS with clearly distinguishable outer rim throughout growth. However, treated MCTS may partly be detached and destroyed and are usually obscured by dead cell debris. We successfully train two Fully Convolutional Networks, UNet and HRNet, and optimize their hyperparameters to develop an automatic segmentation for both untreated and treated MCTS. We systematically validate the automatic segmentation on larger, independent data sets of spheroids derived from two human head-and-neck cancer cell lines. We find an excellent overlap between manual and automatic segmentation for most images, quantified by Jaccard indices at around 90%. For images with smaller overlap of the segmentations, we demonstrate that this error is comparable to the variations across segmentations from different biological experts, suggesting that these images represent biologically unclear or ambiguous cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.

Builds on

11 of 73 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  4. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,420
  5. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
  6. 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 560
  7. 2019Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step backcited by 336
  8. 2018A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1 -- learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decaycited by 226
  9. 2020A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 217
  10. 2020fastai: A Layered API for Deep Learningcited by 183
  11. 2017ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image datacited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.