mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fair Recommendations with Limited Sensitive Attributes: A Distributionally Robust Optimization Approach

arXiv 2405.01063 ↗First posted 2 May 2024cs.IR cs.CY cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As recommender systems are indispensable in various domains such as job searching and e-commerce, providing equitable recommendations to users with different sensitive attributes becomes an imperative requirement. Prior approaches for enhancing fairness in recommender systems presume the availability of all sensitive attributes, which can be difficult to obtain due to privacy concerns or inadequate means of capturing these attributes. In practice, the efficacy of these approaches is limited, pushing us to investigate ways of promoting fairness with limited sensitive attribute information. Toward this goal, it is important to reconstruct missing sensitive attributes. Nevertheless, reconstruction errors are inevitable due to the complexity of real-world sensitive attribute reconstruction problems and legal regulations. Thus, we pursue fair learning methods that are robust to reconstruction errors. To this end, we propose Distributionally Robust Fair Optimization (DRFO), which minimizes the worst-case unfairness over all potential probability distributions of missing sensitive attributes instead of the reconstructed one to account for the impact of the reconstruction errors. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence to demonstrate that our method can effectively ensure fairness in recommender systems when only limited sensitive attributes are accessible.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.

Builds on

21 of 47 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,108
  3. 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
  4. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 363
  5. 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
  6. 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
  7. 2019Distributionally Robust Language Modelingcited by 142
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT Fair for Recommendation? Evaluating Fairness in Large Language Model Recommendationcited by 113
  9. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  10. 2020Robust Optimization for Fairness with Noisy Protected Groupscited by 78
  11. 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
  12. 2017Using Deep Learning and Google Street View to Estimate the Demographic Makeup of the UScited by 66
9 more
  1. 2021Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Featurescited by 45
  2. 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
  3. 2020How to Retrain Recommender System? A Sequential Meta-Learning Methodcited by 42
  4. 2018Fighting Fire with Fire: Using Antidote Data to Improve Polarization and Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 37
  5. 2021TFROM: A Two-sided Fairness-Aware Recommendation Model for Both Customers and Providerscited by 31
  6. 2022Tenrec: A Large-scale Multipurpose Benchmark Dataset for Recommender Systemscited by 31
  7. 2018Proxy Fairnesscited by 29
  8. 2021Fairness without the sensitive attribute via Causal Variational Autoencodercited by 21
  9. 2023Efficient and Joint Hyperparameter and Architecture Search for Collaborative Filteringcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.