Polynomial Chaos Expanded Gaussian Process
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In complex and unknown processes, global models are initially generated over the entire experimental space but often fail to provide accurate predictions in local areas. A common approach is to use local models, which requires partitioning the experimental space and training multiple models, adding significant complexity. Recognizing this limitation, this study addresses the need for models that effectively represent both global and local experimental spaces. It introduces a novel machine learning (ML) approach: Polynomial Chaos Expanded Gaussian Process (PCEGP), leveraging polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) to calculate input-dependent hyperparameters of the Gaussian process (GP). This provides a mathematically interpretable approach that incorporates non-stationary covariance functions and heteroscedastic noise estimation to generate locally adapted models. The model performance is compared to different algorithms in benchmark tests for regression tasks. The results demonstrate low prediction errors of the PCEGP, highlighting model performance that is often competitive with or better than previous methods. A key advantage of the presented model is its interpretable hyperparameters along with training and prediction runtimes comparable to those of a GP.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.
Builds on
15 of 48 references.
References · 15
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 721
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2019BANANAS: Bayesian Optimization with Neural Architectures for Neural Architecture Searchcited by 179
- 2020Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions: Literature Survey and Benchmarkcited by 44
- 2020Active Learning for Deep Gaussian Process Surrogatescited by 38
- 2015Non-Stationary Gaussian Process Regression with Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 29
- 2018Data-driven polynomial chaos expansion for machine learning regressioncited by 25
- 2019Bayesian Optimization using Deep Gaussian Processescited by 22
- 2015Polynomial-Chaos-based Krigingcited by 21
- 2019Deep Structured Mixtures of Gaussian Processescited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.