mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient and Adaptive Posterior Sampling Algorithms for Bandits

arXiv 2405.01010 ↗First posted 2 May 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study Thompson Sampling-based algorithms for stochastic bandits with bounded rewards. As the existing problem-dependent regret bound for Thompson Sampling with Gaussian priors [Agrawal and Goyal, 2017] is vacuous when T ≤ 288 e64, we derive a more practical bound that tightens the coefficient of the leading term %from 288 e64 to 1270. Additionally, motivated by large-scale real-world applications that require scalability, adaptive computational resource allocation, and a balance in utility and computation, we propose two parameterized Thompson Sampling-based algorithms: Thompson Sampling with Model Aggregation (TS-MA-α) and Thompson Sampling with Timestamp Duelling (TS-TD-α), where α ∈ [0,1] controls the trade-off between utility and computation. Both algorithms achieve O left(Klnα+1(T)/Delta right) regret bound, where K is the number of arms, T is the finite learning horizon, and Delta denotes the single round performance loss when pulling a sub-optimal arm.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2024.

Builds on

4 of 17 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020MOTS: Minimax Optimal Thompson Samplingcited by 28
  2. 2017A minimax and asymptotically optimal algorithm for stochastic banditscited by 27
  3. 2021Maillard Sampling: Boltzmann Exploration Done Optimallycited by 13
  4. 2022Finite-Time Regret of Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Exponential Family Multi-Armed Banditscited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.