Is Bigger Edit Batch Size Always Better? -- An Empirical Study on Model Editing with Llama-3
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents a targeted model editing analysis focused on the latest large language model, Llama-3. We explore the efficacy of popular model editing techniques - ROME, MEMIT, and EMMET, which are designed for precise layer interventions. We identify the most effective layers for targeted edits through an evaluation that encompasses up to 4096 edits across three distinct strategies: sequential editing, batch editing, and a hybrid approach we call as sequential-batch editing. Our findings indicate that increasing edit batch-sizes may degrade model performance more significantly than using smaller edit batches sequentially for equal number of edits. With this, we argue that sequential model editing is an important component for scaling model editing methods and future research should focus on methods that combine both batched and sequential editing. This observation suggests a potential limitation in current model editing methods which push towards bigger edit batch sizes, and we hope it paves way for future investigations into optimizing batch sizes and model editing performance.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.
Builds on
8 of 11 references.
References · 8
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 367
- 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 237
- 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 183
- 2023A Brief Review of Hypernetworks in Deep Learningcited by 102
- 2024Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 92
- 2024A Unified Framework for Model Editingcited by 54
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Representation Shattering in Transformers: A Synthetic Study with Knowledge Editingcited by 18
- 2025Lifelong Knowledge Editing requires Better Regularizationcited by 9
- 2025Context-Robust Knowledge Editing for Language Modelscited by 8
- 2024BTBR: A Bayesian-Theory-Driven Probabilistic-Fuzzy Framework for Implicit Bias Removal in Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Efficient Knowledge Editing via Minimal Precomputationcited by 3
- 2024Keys to Robust Edits: from Theoretical Insights to Practical Advancescited by 2
- 2026SHRED: Retain-Set-Free Unlearning via Self-Distillation with Logit Demotioncited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Worlds for Temporal Evaluation and Knowledge Updating in LLMscited by 0
- 2026Synthetic Worlds for Temporal Evaluation and Knowledge Updating in LLMs31 Aug 2026
- 2026SHRED: Retain-Set-Free Unlearning via Self-Distillation with Logit Demotion8 May 2026
- 2025Efficient Knowledge Editing via Minimal Precomputation4 Jun 2025
- 2025Context-Robust Knowledge Editing for Language Models29 May 2025
- 2025Lifelong Knowledge Editing requires Better Regularization3 Feb 2025
- 2024Representation Shattering in Transformers: A Synthetic Study with Knowledge Editing22 Oct 2024
- 2024Keys to Robust Edits: from Theoretical Insights to Practical Advances12 Oct 2024
- 2024BTBR: A Bayesian-Theory-Driven Probabilistic-Fuzzy Framework for Implicit Bias Removal in Large Language Models20 Aug 2024