Multigroup Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To address the shortcomings of real-world datasets, robust learning algorithms have been designed to overcome arbitrary and indiscriminate data corruption. However, practical processes of gathering data may lead to patterns of data corruption that are localized to specific partitions of the training dataset. Motivated by critical applications where the learned model is deployed to make predictions about people from a rich collection of overlapping subpopulations, we initiate the study of multigroup robust algorithms whose robustness guarantees for each subpopulation only degrade with the amount of data corruption inside that subpopulation. When the data corruption is not distributed uniformly over subpopulations, our algorithms provide more meaningful robustness guarantees than standard guarantees that are oblivious to how the data corruption and the affected subpopulations are related. Our techniques establish a new connection between multigroup fairness and robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2024.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 443
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
- 2016Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariancecited by 131
- 2020Subpopulation Data Poisoning Attackscited by 68
- 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 61
- 2020Poisoning Attacks on Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 58
10 more
- 2021Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Trainingcited by 48
- 2017Robustly Learning a Gaussian: Getting Optimal Error, Efficientlycited by 39
- 2023Oracle Efficient Online Multicalibration and Omnipredictioncited by 36
- 2022Fair Infinitesimal Jackknife: Mitigating the Influence of Biased Training Data Points Without Refittingcited by 26
- 2021Poisoning Attacks on Fair Machine Learningcited by 19
- 2023Loss Minimization Yields Multicalibration for Large Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2022Subgroup Robustness Grows On Trees: An Empirical Baseline Investigationcited by 17
- 2022Omnipredictors for Constrained Optimizationcited by 14
- 2022Fairness-aware Regression Robust to Adversarial Attackscited by 4
- 2023To be Robust and to be Fair: Aligning Fairness with Robustnesscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemmacited by 15
- 2025Auditability and the Landscape of Distance to Multicalibrationcited by 0
- 2025Auditability and the Landscape of Distance to Multicalibration21 Sep 2025
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemma8 Aug 2024