More Compute Is What You Need
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model pre-training has become increasingly expensive, with most practitioners relying on scaling laws to allocate compute budgets for model size and training tokens, commonly referred to as Compute-Optimal or Chinchilla Optimal. In this paper, we hypothesize a new scaling law that suggests model performance depends mostly on the amount of compute spent for transformer-based models, independent of the specific allocation to model size and dataset size. Using this unified scaling law, we predict that (a) for inference efficiency, training should prioritize smaller model sizes and larger training datasets, and (b) assuming the exhaustion of available web datasets, scaling the model size might be the only way to further improve model performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2024.
Builds on
8 of 11 references.
References · 8
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,883
- 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 706
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 621
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
- 2023Beyond Chinchilla-Optimal: Accounting for Inference in Language Model Scaling Lawscited by 155
- 2024JetMoE: Reaching Llama2 Performance with 0.1M Dollarscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.