mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness in AI: challenges in bridging the gap between algorithms and law

arXiv 2404.19371 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2024cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we examine algorithmic fairness from the perspective of law aiming to identify best practices and strategies for the specification and adoption of fairness definitions and algorithms in real-world systems and use cases. We start by providing a brief introduction of current anti-discrimination law in the European Union and the United States and discussing the concepts of bias and fairness from an legal and ethical viewpoint. We then proceed by presenting a set of algorithmic fairness definitions by example, aiming to communicate their objectives to non-technical audiences. Then, we introduce a set of core criteria that need to be taken into account when selecting a specific fairness definition for real-world use case applications. Finally, we enumerate a set of key considerations and best practices for the design and employment of fairness methods on real-world AI applications

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.