Learning Governing Equations of Unobserved States in Dynamical Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data-driven modelling and scientific machine learning have been responsible for significant advances in determining suitable models to describe data. Within dynamical systems, neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs), where the system equations are set to be governed by a neural network, have become a popular tool for this challenge in recent years. However, less emphasis has been placed on systems that are only partially-observed. In this work, we employ a hybrid neural ODE structure, where the system equations are governed by a combination of a neural network and domain-specific knowledge, together with symbolic regression (SR), to learn governing equations of partially-observed dynamical systems. We test this approach on two case studies: A 3-dimensional model of the Lotka-Volterra system and a 5-dimensional model of the Lorenz system. We demonstrate that the method is capable of successfully learning the true underlying governing equations of unobserved states within these systems, with robustness to measurement noise.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.
Builds on
9 of 33 references.
References · 9
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 353
- 2022Discovering Governing Equations from Partial Measurements with Deep Delay Autoencoderscited by 58
- 2018Learning unknown ODE models with Gaussian processescited by 54
- 2022Learning Sparse Nonlinear Dynamics via Mixed-Integer Optimizationcited by 29
- 2020Inference of dynamic systems from noisy and sparse data via manifold-constrained Gaussian processescited by 18
- 2019Gaussian Process Assisted Active Learning of Physical Lawscited by 14
- 2024Dynamical System Identification, Model Selection and Model Uncertainty Quantification by Bayesian Inferencecited by 9
- 2023Gaussian process learning of nonlinear dynamicscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.
7 papers.
- 2025Position: Biology is the Challenge Physics-Informed ML Needs to Evolvecited by 4
- 2025Data-driven Discovery of Digital Twins in Biomedical Researchcited by 2
- 2025Unified Spatiotemporal Physics-Informed Learning (USPIL): A Framework for Modeling Complex Predator-Prey Dynamicscited by 1
- 2026Learning partially observed systems with neural Hamiltonian ordinary differential equationscited by 0
- 2026RTS Smoother-Guided Learning of Physics-Based Neural Differential Modelscited by 0
- 2026FluxDisco: Symbolic Regression for Stoichiometric Dynamical Systems via Monte Carlo Graph Searchcited by 0
- 2026Retracing Hodgkin and Huxley: State Recovery Does Not Certify Mechanismcited by 0
- 2026Retracing Hodgkin and Huxley: State Recovery Does Not Certify Mechanism28 Sep 2026
- 2026FluxDisco: Symbolic Regression for Stoichiometric Dynamical Systems via Monte Carlo Graph Search4 Sep 2026
- 2026RTS Smoother-Guided Learning of Physics-Based Neural Differential Models16 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning partially observed systems with neural Hamiltonian ordinary differential equations22 May 2026
- 2025Position: Biology is the Challenge Physics-Informed ML Needs to Evolve29 Oct 2025
- 2025Unified Spatiotemporal Physics-Informed Learning (USPIL): A Framework for Modeling Complex Predator-Prey Dynamics16 Sep 2025
- 2025Data-driven Discovery of Digital Twins in Biomedical Research29 Aug 2025