mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LangBiTe: A Platform for Testing Bias in Large Language Models

arXiv 2404.18558 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into various software applications raises concerns about their potential biases. Typically, those models are trained on a vast amount of data scrapped from forums, websites, social media and other internet sources, which may instill harmful and discriminating behavior into the model. To address this issue, we present LangBiTe, a testing platform to systematically assess the presence of biases within an LLM. LangBiTe enables development teams to tailor their test scenarios, and automatically generate and execute the test cases according to a set of user-defined ethical requirements. Each test consists of a prompt fed into the LLM and a corresponding test oracle that scrutinizes the LLM's response for the identification of biases. LangBite provides users with the bias evaluation of LLMs, and end-to-end traceability between the initial ethical requirements and the insights obtained.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.

Builds on

6 of 13 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  3. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  4. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  5. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  6. 2019Evaluating the Underlying Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 94

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.