Explainability of machine learning approaches in forensic linguistics: a case study in geolinguistic authorship profiling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Forensic authorship profiling uses linguistic markers to infer characteristics about an author of a text. This task is paralleled in dialect classification, where a prediction is made about the linguistic variety of a text based on the text itself. While there have been significant advances in recent years in variety classification, forensic linguistics rarely relies on these approaches due to their lack of transparency, among other reasons. In this paper we therefore explore the explainability of machine learning approaches considering the forensic context. We focus on variety classification as a means of geolinguistic profiling of unknown texts based on social media data from the German-speaking area. For this, we identify the lexical items that are the most impactful for the variety classification. We find that the extracted lexical features are indeed representative of their respective varieties and note that the trained models also rely on place names for classifications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2024.
Builds on
8 of 35 references.
References · 8
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 951
- 2016Understanding Neural Networks through Representation Erasurecited by 223
- 2019Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptionscited by 81
- 2018Automatic Language Identification in Texts: A Surveycited by 40
- 2018Understanding Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classificationcited by 36
- 2024Extracting Lexical Features from Dialects via Interpretable Dialect Classifierscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.