mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Note on Asynchronous Challenges: Unveiling Formulaic Bias and Data Loss in the Hayashi-Yoshida Estimator

arXiv 2404.18233 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2024stat.ML cs.LG math.COcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Hayashi-Yoshida (HY)-estimator exhibits an intrinsic, telescoping property that leads to an often overlooked computational bias, which we denote,formulaic or intrinsic bias. This formulaic bias results in data loss by cancelling out potentially relevant data points, the nonextant data points. This paper attempts to formalize and quantify the data loss arising from this bias. In particular, we highlight the existence of nonextant data points via a concrete example, and prove necessary and sufficient conditions for the telescoping property to induce this type of formulaic bias.Since this type of bias is nonexistent when inputs, i.e., observation times, Pi(1) :=(ti(1))i=0,1,ldots and Pi(2) :=(tj(2))j=0,1,ldots, are synchronous, we introduce the (a,b)-asynchronous adversary. This adversary generates inputs Pi(1) and Pi(2) according to two independent homogenous Poisson processes with rates a>0 and b>0, respectively. We address the foundational questions regarding cumulative minimal (or least) average data point loss, and determine the values for a and b. We prove that for equal rates a=b, the minimal average cumulative data loss over both inputs is attained and amounts to 25%. We present an algorithm, which is based on our theorem, for computing the exact number of nonextant data points given inputs Pi(1) and Pi(2), and suggest alternative methods. Finally, we use simulated data to empirically compare the (cumulative) average data loss of the (HY)-estimator.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2024.

Builds on

0 of 12 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.