mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Precise Observations of Neural Model Robustness in Classification

arXiv 2404.16457 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2024cs.SE cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In deep learning applications, robustness measures the ability of neural models that handle slight changes in input data, which could lead to potential safety hazards, especially in safety-critical applications. Pre-deployment assessment of model robustness is essential, but existing methods often suffer from either high costs or imprecise results. To enhance safety in real-world scenarios, metrics that effectively capture the model's robustness are needed. To address this issue, we compare the rigour and usage conditions of various assessment methods based on different definitions. Then, we propose a straightforward and practical metric utilizing hypothesis testing for probabilistic robustness and have integrated it into the TorchAttacks library. Through a comparative analysis of diverse robustness assessment methods, our approach contributes to a deeper understanding of model robustness in safety-critical applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2024.

Builds on

6 of 10 references.

References · 6

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  4. 2022Certified Training: Small Boxes are All You Needcited by 51
  5. 2022Probabilistically Robust Learning: Balancing Average- and Worst-case Performancecited by 36
  6. 2022PRoA: A Probabilistic Robustness Assessment against Functional Perturbationscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.