mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Return of EM: Entity-driven Answer Set Expansion for QA Evaluation

arXiv 2404.15650 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, directly using large language models (LLMs) has been shown to be the most reliable method to evaluate QA models. However, it suffers from limited interpretability, high cost, and environmental harm. To address these, we propose to use soft EM with entity-driven answer set expansion. Our approach expands the gold answer set to include diverse surface forms, based on the observation that the surface forms often follow particular patterns depending on the entity type. The experimental results show that our method outperforms traditional evaluation methods by a large margin. Moreover, the reliability of our evaluation method is comparable to that of LLM-based ones, while offering the benefits of high interpretability and reduced environmental harm.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2024.

Builds on

21 of 26 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  7. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
  8. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
  9. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
  10. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  11. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
  12. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
9 more
  1. 2023Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answeringcited by 151
  2. 2021Salient Phrase Aware Dense Retrieval: Can a Dense Retriever Imitate a Sparse One?cited by 60
  3. 2021Semantic Answer Similarity for Evaluating Question Answering Modelscited by 47
  4. 2023Cost-Effective Hyperparameter Optimization for Large Language Model Generation Inferencecited by 40
  5. 2023TCRA-LLM: Token Compression Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model for Inference Cost Reductioncited by 34
  6. 2023ChatGPT Needs SPADE (Sustainability, PrivAcy, Digital divide, and Ethics) Evaluation: A Reviewcited by 28
  7. 2021What's in a Name? Answer Equivalence For Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 21
  8. 2023Watt For What: Rethinking Deep Learning's Energy-Performance Relationshipcited by 16
  9. 2020AVA: an Automatic eValuation Approach to Question Answering Systemscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.